Anti NSL

phPhilippines

China has just given itself jurisdiction in Philippines over its Philippine critics.

Will the Philippine government defend you?

Jump ahead: What can I do?

On 30 June 2020, the Chinese government forced through a so-called national security law through its Hong Kong puppet government. Among others, its provisions contained vague and broad wordings including "provoking hatred", which is Chinese statespeak for anything that the regime doesn't like.

Art. 29 a person who requests ... or conspires with a foreign country or an institution, organisation or individual ... [in] imposing sanctions or blockage, or engaging in other hostile activities ... or provoking ... hatred ... [against the Hong Kong or Chinese governments].

What's more, Beijing has given itself jurisdiction in Philippines, even extending to non-Chinese and non-Hongkongers. That includes Filipinos.

Art. 38 This Law shall apply to offences ... committed ... outside [Hong Kong] by a person who is not a [Hongkonger].

Beijing will request information from the Philippine government.

Art. 43(5) requiring ... foreign country ... to provide information

And the law will be run by some secret Chinese state committee, away from Philippine eyes.

Art. 14 No institution, organisation or individual ... shall interfere with the work of the Committee. Information ... shall not be subject to disclosure. Decisions ... shall not be amenable to judicial review.

Art. 41 When circumstances arise ... all or part of the trial shall be closed to the media and the public

You may download the English full text of the so-called national security law for further research. The text was published by China's state media. The original text is was published by the Hong Kong government.

But that's not Philippine law?

Philippines has extradition agreement and legal assistance agreement with Hong Kong.

Philippines has extradition agreement and legal assistance agreement with China.

Unfortunately this is Philippine law.

The Philippine government may hand you over, along with your data, to China upon request.

Extradition Agreement with Hong Kong

The following extradition agreement between the Philippine government and the Hong Kong government was signed in 1995. It is currently In effect.

香港政府和菲律賓共和國政府關於移交被控告及被定罪的人的協定Agreement between the Government of Hong Kong and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines for the Surrender of Accused and Convicted Person

Signed on: 1995-01-30

Termination clause: upon 6 months notice

Link: Hong Kong

Full text: Hong Kong

This allows the Philippine government to accept requests from the Hong Kong government to hand over suspects to Hong Kong.

Legal Assistance Agreement with Hong Kong

The following legal assistance agreement between the Philippine government and the Hong Kong government was signed in 2001. It is currently In effect.

中華人民共和國香港特別行政區政府與菲律賓共和國政府關於刑事事宜相互司法協助的協定Agreement between the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines Concerning Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters

Signed on: 2001-02-23

Termination clause: upon 90 days notice

Link: Hong Kong

Full text: Hong Kong

This allows the Philippine government to accept requests from the Hong Kong government to hand over information related to a suspected case to Hong Kong.

Extradition Agreement with China

The following extradition agreement between the Philippine government and the Chinese government was signed in 2001. It is currently In effect.

中華人民共和國和菲律賓共和國引渡條約

Signed on: 2001-10-30

Termination clause: upon 6 months notice

Link: China

Full text: China

This allows the Philippine government to accept requests from the Chinese government to hand over suspects to China.

Legal Assistance Agreement with China

The following legal assistance agreement between the Philippine government and the Chinese government was signed in 2000. It is currently In effect.

中華人民共和國和菲律賓共和國關於刑事司法協助的條約

Signed on: 2000-10-16

Termination clause: upon 180 days notice

Link: China

Full text: China

This allows the Philippine government to accept requests from the Chinese government to hand over information related to a suspected case to China.

Safeguard clauses?

China has a history of fabricating criminal charges. The infamous "soliciting prostitution" charge is frequently employed on dissidents. Furthermore, Torture is employed by law enforcement officers. Beijing exerts political pressure on foreign governments in extradition matters.

While there are safeguard clauses guarding against abuse and political crimes, it essentially comes down to whether the Philippine government believes in China's case or not. This is, of course, subject to political pressure from China. Even in best case scenario, “unlikely” is insufficient reassurance for Filipinos and Hongkongers alike.

No Filipino should be sacrificed for economic, trade, or other interests with China.

What can I do?

Will you trust the Philippine government to defend your freedoms and rights?

Or will your government sacrifice you for the next trade deal with China?

General public

  • Tweet or write to your local politician, scholar, or expert for opinion and policy changes
  • Invite media to report on this grave issue
  • Form or invite your local concern groups to join in the initiative
  • Invite your local politicians, activists, or organizations to sign the global joint Statement
  • Use our Extradition risk world map to plan your travels

Politicians, activists, and groups who have joined in previous efforts may be more inclined to help you:

Politicians and legislators

Urgent policy and legislative changes are needed to protect Filipinos from China. No matter how lucrative China deals are, no Filipino may be sacrificed as a bargaining chip. Philippine laws should always defend its people and guarantee freedoms of opinion and expression from undue Chinese influence. There must not be any mechanism for Beijing to implement draconian laws on Philippine land, on any Philippine citizen.

  • Declare both China and Hong Kong governments to be violating "One Country, Two Systems" and international obligations. This was the foundation upon which Philippines builds its relationship with Hong Kong, separately from China; but the so-called national security law was passed by China legislature and promulgated by Hong Kong. Ref: acts by the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada, Australia, along with other international actors.
  • Terminate or suspend the extradition agreement and the legal assistance agreement.
  • Amend Philippine legislation to include provisions against any current or future extradition or legal assistance agreements with Hong Kong and China. This is essential to protect Filipinos from China during the 6 months / 90 days / 180 days period before termination takes effect.
  • Issue travel warnings against Hong Kong and China, for the threat of so-called national security law being used against travellers.
  • Join and sign our global joint Statement

Media

Filipinos have a right to know that there exists a mechanism in Philippine law that exposes Filipinos to being imminently targetted by China through its self-declared global jurisdiction under the so-called national security law.

  • Investigate and report on the so-called national security law issue in Hong Kong.
  • Investigate and report on the extradition agreement and legal assistance agreement.

Scholars and academia

The so-called national security law opens up important questions on international politics and legal scholarship. Research and reports that may be helpful:

  • Validity and abuse of extraterritorial jurisdiction, centred around Art. 38
  • International law and abuse of the cross-jurisdiction mutual assistance agreements
  • Status and viability of the "One Country, Two Systems" framework
  • Hong Kong as a case of systematic failed and hostile government

Say NO to China extradition.